<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: apples new thing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://the-way-to-the-centre.org.uk/blog/2007/01/11/apples-new-thing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://the-way-to-the-centre.org.uk/blog/2007/01/11/apples-new-thing/</link>
	<description>a Lazlo Woodbine thriller</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 11:29:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elessar</title>
		<link>http://the-way-to-the-centre.org.uk/blog/2007/01/11/apples-new-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-10452</link>
		<dc:creator>Elessar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 22:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-way-to-the-centre.org.uk/blog/archives/2007/01/11/apples-new-thing/#comment-10452</guid>
		<description>I know Cisco copyrighted the name, but i think based on when the name was copyrighted and the fact that Apple has an &#039;i&#039; in front of most of their popular products, Cisco&#039;s trademark could possibly be thrown out based on a lack of use.

Plus, how bad would it look on Cisco&#039;s behalf if they trademarked the name just to spite Apple...honestly i don&#039;t see them using the name for any of their products.  Apple on the other hand, has a legitimate reason to use the name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know Cisco copyrighted the name, but i think based on when the name was copyrighted and the fact that Apple has an &#8216;i&#8217; in front of most of their popular products, Cisco&#8217;s trademark could possibly be thrown out based on a lack of use.</p>
<p>Plus, how bad would it look on Cisco&#8217;s behalf if they trademarked the name just to spite Apple&#8230;honestly i don&#8217;t see them using the name for any of their products.  Apple on the other hand, has a legitimate reason to use the name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://the-way-to-the-centre.org.uk/blog/2007/01/11/apples-new-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-10311</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-way-to-the-centre.org.uk/blog/archives/2007/01/11/apples-new-thing/#comment-10311</guid>
		<description>I saw that, and I can&#039;t for a moment think that Apple are not going to win hands-down. It may not be right but I can&#039;t help think that the iThing naming convention has been cornered. (That being said, I would like to see Apple take on Ibiza...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw that, and I can&#8217;t for a moment think that Apple are not going to win hands-down. It may not be right but I can&#8217;t help think that the iThing naming convention has been cornered. (That being said, I would like to see Apple take on Ibiza&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elessar</title>
		<link>http://the-way-to-the-centre.org.uk/blog/2007/01/11/apples-new-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-10148</link>
		<dc:creator>Elessar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 05:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-way-to-the-centre.org.uk/blog/archives/2007/01/11/apples-new-thing/#comment-10148</guid>
		<description>I believe Cisco is also suing Apple for copyright infringement or trademark infringement over the name &#039;iPhone&#039;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe Cisco is also suing Apple for copyright infringement or trademark infringement over the name &#8216;iPhone&#8217;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
